Skip to content

Why Didn’t Vermont Apologize for Eugenics and Sterilizations??

December 28, 2010

Vermont Legislature considers eugenics apology
Politics and Government
Vermont Legislature considers eugenics apology
By Dave Gram, The Associated Press • Wednesday, February 3, 2010
BurlingtonFreePress.com
MONTPELIER — If the state of Vermont had carried out a plan to sterilize his grandmother, Don Stevens said Tuesday, he “wouldn’t be here.”
Many Vermonters of mixed French Canadian and American Indian heritage, like Stevens’ grandmother, as well as poor, rural whites, were placed on a state-sanctioned list of “mental defectives” and degenerates in the 1930s and placed in state institutions like the Home for the
Some had surgery after Gov. Stanley Wilson in 1931 won enactment of a sterilization law. It was designed to reduce the number of people seen as placing demands on public services, and to purify what University of Vermont zoology professor Henry Perkins, a national leader of the so-called “eugenics” movement, called “the fine old stock of original settlers in Vermont.”
Now the Legislature, which once endorsed breeding people like cattle, is considering a resolution expressing regret. It vows never to repeat “this dark chapter in Vermont’s history” and expresses the Legislature’s “profound sorrow and sincere regret that such a program of sterilization was sanctioned.”
For some of those testifying before the House Human Services Committee on Tuesday, the resolution did not go far enough. Committee members agreed to work on some wording changes to address the criticisms before voting to send the measure to the full House.
Vermont became the 27th state to pass a sterilization law in 1931. Indiana passed the first such law in 1907, followed closely by Connecticut, according to research provided to the House committee by Rep. Anne Donahue, R-Northfield, author of the resolution.
Now, at least five states have issued apologies. A Virginia resolution, passed in 2001, urged citizens “to become familiar with the history of the eugenics movement, in the belief that a more educated, enlightened and tolerant population will reject absolutely any such abhorrent pseudoscientific movement in the future.”
No one knows exactly how many sterilizations were performed as a result of Vermont’s law. Judy Dow, 55, of Essex, a descendant of one of the families targeted and a teacher of American Indian culture, said about 6,000 Vermonters were identified by the Vermont Eugenics Survey, founded by Perkins, as being genetically defective.
Dow said the resolution needs to be broader than an expression of regret about the sterilizations. She spoke of families broken up by state social workers and by people being sent to institutions, sometimes for the offense of having French, and not English, as their first language.
Dow told the committee to focus only on those who were sterilized and not others included on the eugenics list “would be a slap in the face to the 6,000 people who are not being considered.”
Stevens, a 43-year-old information technology director from Shelburne, said the effects of the eugenics movement were “still fresh in people’s minds. My grandmother was listed in the Eugenics Survey.” Other family members were labeled on the state’s lists as “having only one eye,” or as a “perfect devil,” and therefore likely to breed criminal children.
He said he could live with something close to the resolution’s current wording.
“You have to start somewhere. … If you don’t, then nobody will ever feel confident that the state is really sorry for the eugenics movement,” Stevens said.

Advertisements
2 Comments leave one →
  1. December 28, 2010 4:06 PM

    Hi
    good mesage

  2. Bryan Ashley-Selleck permalink
    January 16, 2011 2:50 PM

    And vermont thinks it is so far ahead of everyone else? NOT! This is totally disgusting at its best. Apologies for sure, but even then they do no justice to those that were affected by this. Its incredible how some people think that they are so far above everyone else and can make the rules that effect others who are less fortunate.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: